Dave’s going down

Drift and disillusionment will lose Cameron the next election

6 October 2012

By now, it will be clear even to David Cameron that he is on course to lose the next general election. The British electoral system always was rigged against the Conservatives, and his hopes for changing that were dashed by Nick Clegg before the summer holidays, when he scuppered Tory plans for boundary reform. All parties are returning to a new reality: the economic recovery has evaporated, and with it the Tories’ chances of winning next time. An unprepared Labour Party is cruising towards power, under a leader who has just held a surprisingly successful party conference. Every bookmaker now agrees: Cameron is heading for a crash.

The Tory party conference, which starts in Birmingham this weekend, ought to be a crisis meeting. How did things get to this stage? Is coalition the problem, or just a convenient excuse? Where is George Osborne’s growth strategy and might this be a good time to produce one? But the Tory conference is not really about the Tory party any more. You can walk around the complex all day without encountering the word ‘Conservative’. This is a festival of government, not of politics. Any Tory party members who want frank and urgent political discussion will be coming to the wrong place.

But there is plenty to discuss. The boundary review would have given the Tories about 20 more seats. When Clegg vetoed it, in vengeance for the Conservatives’ spoiling of his Lords reform, it was an act of sabotage which, ironically, has made the coalition more stable. ‘The glue that binds both of us together now is fear of the electorate,’ says one newly promoted minister. ‘Neither of us wants an election. Cameron will do pretty much anything to stay Prime Minister and give the Lib Dems anything.’ There is a feeling that Cameron’s first loyalty is to the coalition, not the party — and that if the Tories are doomed in 2015, he doesn’t much care.

This is quite untrue. Mr Cameron may well join a long, distinguished list of Tory leaders in not caring much for the activists. But he does very much care about winning elections, and has constructed 10 Downing Street accordingly. He has an opinion pollster, Andrew Cooper, as a chief strategist. The frequency of U-turns is nothing if not testimony to an excessive reverence for public opinion. No other prime minister has asked his chancellor to also act as chief electoral strategist. For many around Cameron, government is party political warfare by other means.


And here lies the paradox. The more the Tories obsess over elections, the worse they appear to be at winning them. Cameron already has the dubious distinction of being the most electorally unsuccessful Tory to make it to No. 10, which in itself bodes ill for 2015. His unlucky streak has not run out. His proposal for city mayors was rejected by almost every city asked. A competent, election-winning No. 10 might have been able to sniff out decent candidates for next month’s police commissioner elections. But the Tories failed and a new generation of Labour placemen look set to sweep the board, ready to denounce Tory cuts.

Recent victories — Boris Johnson’s election and the AV campaign — were due to independent campaign teams who kept well clear of the official Conservative machine. Even Tory donors are wondering (as Lord Ashcroft put it earlier this week) ‘what on earth CCHQ thinks it was doing with my money’. The Prime Minister and the Chancellor are finding themselves being dragged out to have dinner with guests expected to produce £50,000 donations. Not so long ago, they were only called upon to solicit six-figure sums and Andrew Feldman, the party chairman, was left to deal with the small beer. But the Tories are now embarrassingly grateful for any beer they can get.

There is even a shortage of those who work for free. Many Tory MPs report disillusion and absences in their constituency party: the grassroots don’t understand why the Prime Minister feels the need to keep picking fights with them over issues like planning and High Speed Rail. Cameron’s proposals for gay marriage are blamed by one MP for halving the number of volunteers prepared to help post leaflets or knock on doors come election time.

Cameron’s problem has been drift rather than disaster. Just two years ago, his strategy seemed plausible and even radical. Schools and welfare would change, utterly. A dual strategy was adopted by George Osborne: denouncing debt, while quietly feasting on it. At the time, most economists backed him: a recovery was underway, so Osborne could give himself six long years to balance his budget. But when the headwinds strengthened, Osborne decided to hunker down rather than respond with pro-growth policies. Embarrassingly, a Chancellor who defines himself by deficit reduction is now set to enter a 2015 election nursing the biggest deficit in the western world.

This leaves precious little to boast about at this Tory conference. Michael Gove’s free schools are opening, each one a local triumph. But the government’s failure to throw its weight behind the programme has made progress slow. Just 79 of them are now open, whereas an extra 430 schools would need to open each year just to cope with demand. Welfare reform is proceeding apace, but Iain Duncan Smith is at the start of a decade-long project. Quantitative easing has kept the drug of cheap debt flowing, especially to the government. But it is a sorry substitute for growth.

Cameron is hardly devoid of accomplishment. He has put together a coalition in one of the most fractious parliaments in the world. He helped stop genocide in Libya and his education and welfare agenda could yet transform Britain. But voters tend to judge politicians by what they do, not by what they say — and so far, this government has pitifully little to show for itself. The bookmakers who predict Cameron’s demise also have Boris Johnson as the most likely candidate to replace him. The Mayor is circling: he protests he has no prime ministerial ambitions. But he likes to ask himself: if it were me versus Gove fighting to be leader of HM’s Opposition, who would win?

Cameron’s defeat, while horribly likely, is not inevitable. An implosion in the European Union may lead to British withdrawal, in which case all bets are off. Also, Labour’s 10-point lead hardly guarantees victory. Neil Kinnock commanded a 23-point lead and still went on to lose to John Major. Nor is it impossible for the Tories to win more seats with fewer votes: this is precisely what Baroness Thatcher did after her first, tumultuous term in power. Her weapon, in 1983, was the Labour/SDP split. Some senior Tories want to repeat the trick this time, and have a new, Vince Cable-led Lib Dem party steal votes from Miliband just as the SDP stole them from Michael Foot.

Cameron, of course, has escaped from worse scraps. Five years ago, he went to the Blackpool conference where the party was expecting to fight (and lose) an election within weeks. He held his nerve, and scared Gordon Brown into cancelling the election. He specialises in avoiding political death traps, but he also has a gift for stumbling into them in the first place. For Tory party members, it’s all a bit tiring. The Prime Minister is a good and natural leader, when he feels the need to act with urgency. Now would be a rather good time for him to look down, and panic.

More Spectator for less. Subscribe and receive 12 issues delivered for just £12, with full web and app access. Join us now.

  • London Calling

    I agree…great cartoon also….:)

  • Jackthesmilingblack

    If Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were excluded, England would never have Labour governments.

    • martinvickers

      If Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were excluded, Labour would be back in, in one for or another, within the natural cycle (10-15 years) – all democratic systems tend, over time, to relative equilibrium. to think otherwise is naive.

    • martinvickers

      I might add, the same applies to Wales and Scotland – just look how quickly the complete Labour stranglehold on scotland at devolved level became a relatively even contest once a modicum of actual democracy entered the debate. My own Northern Ireland remains the only exception, as a slightly more civilised version of the Bosnian Federation.

  • Pingback: Cameron helps bring us together | Orphans of Liberty()

  • Stephen Green

    Good article apart from one point. Thatcher achieved victory in 83 largely due to her stance, and the success of British forces, in the Falklands War the previous year. I douby Afghanistan/Libya etc will be able to produce the same effect for Cameron somehow

  • ledbydonkeys

    The country knew it had made a big mistake the day after the election and was relieved to see Gordon Brown still in No 10 for those few days after. It was then up to the Lib Dems to make the right decision which was obviously too much for them.. Then came that dreadful moment in the rose garden when Cameron said ‘Come Back’ to Clegg in that silly voice as Clegg feigned to walk away.. Just awful!! You could almost hear the collective voice of the country saying ‘keep walking’, but the greedy fool turned round and this sorry period of British history began..

    • Ridcully

      Yes, the country indeed knew it had made a big mistake when they realised that they had turned away from the socialist nirvana we had lived under for the previous 13 years.

  • d c andersson

    A bit of evidence, please, for ‘the British electoral system was always rigged against the Conservatives’. At first blush, transparently untrue.

    • Matthew Whitehouse

      Why dont you google it and find out for yourself first hand. If the writer of this article actually responded personally to your comment, would you believe him? Probably not. So – FIND YOUR OWN FKIN EVIDENCE when you can be arsed that is – you will see there is plenty of vidence for it – you lazy sh*t!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Simon-Fay/1127268875 Simon Fay

    It’s rather a long time to have to wait, 2015. And as he says himself,it’s just a matter of being better at explaining his govt’s & clients’ needs to us, their captives.

    • Jose Luis

      I am not as gloomy as Fraser. Labour had a nothing conference, no policy statements, just Mr Wonky trying to be recognised and known by the electorate, and I really doubt they will vote Liebor back in. If I am wrong, got help UK plc and and the entire population. I am reckoning on a coalition of some type.

      • redmary2

        So you admit that the Tories cannot win a majority on their own, Where in the Tory party conference did they come up with a policy to get us out of this recession,? and to get growth,? there was none, when Labour left government, we had a modest growth, as soon as Butch Cam & the flat-line kid took over they thrashed it, They have finished the Tory party off for good, and the sooner you and the rest of the Tories realize it the better,

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Arthur-Dent/100003072704387 Arthur Dent

    People who would like to vote Conservative have been disenfranchised because Cameron is not a Conservative.

    • Mark

      Got it in one.

    • dalai guevara

      And quite famously Bliar wasn’t a socialist. What am I getting at? Do we need to stop thinking in left and right, but in right and wrong?

  • Austin Barry

    “He helped stop genocide in Libya…”

    He doesn’t care though much about demographic genocide in this country.

  • philip sayers

    whos this bloke nelson trying to kid about the electoral system rigged against the tories. hes a total joke and he still cannot talk properly!!!

    • philip sayers

      well said,philip.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jonny.castro.372 Jonny Castro

    He added, “it’s about people’s hopes and dreams, when you get the keys to your first flat, it’s a magic moment.”

    Yeah, real PM material when he speaks such utter tosh.

    • martinvickers

      Actually, to be fair, a first home is pretty magic for many of us – we just don’t tend to spoil the moment by saying – “thank Goodness for government policies on housing and interest rates!!” as we cross the threshold.

      For better or ill, it just doesn’t have the cultural relevance of, say, the NHS.

  • james

    The Tories can only get into power if the economy turns for the better.However this is where the problem lies.The economically correct path to follow is politically and socially painful.There is simply to much debt in the economy at large.The economically correct path would be to dismantle the welfare state and drive spending down in real terms i.e 700bln spending this year,550bln spending next year.This would lead to a depression that would clear out all the bad debts in the economy at large and allow companies,institutions that are fundamentally bankrupt to do exactly that go bankrupt.
    The social consequences however would be huge.Talk about growth is a non-starter as most of the growth in previous times was debt induced.In the long run the government must follow the correct economic path regardless since economics trumps everything else.

    • balakris

      Heard of a chap called Keynes?

  • Floating Voter

    It seemed odd to me at the time that Cameron gave up the boundary change reforms without a fight. Which rather supports the view that “he doesn’t much care” rather than your view that “he does very much care about winning elections”. 20 more seats would have given a majority in 2010 and could again be crucial in 2015.

  • pippin21

    ” his education and welfare agenda could yet transform Britain” into a 3rd world country like the USA (yes it is a 3rd world country if you look at the number of desperately poor souls living there) – people sleeping in cars because they cannot afford to rent a home. People here are having to choose between paying for heating or eating (my dilemma) or those who are being vilified for being disabled and unable to work (my dilemma as a carer). They call themselves CONSERVATIVES? No FASCIST is more like it.

Can't find your Web ID? Click here