Why no one’s ready to oust Nick Clegg (except the Tories, of course)

He’s propping up the Labour vote, but firing him might just mean different Lib Dems lose their seats

31 May 2014

Nigel Farage is pretty good at giving people hangovers, and on Monday morning all three Westminster party leaders woke up with one. Ukip’s victory in the European elections represents the first time in more than a hundred years that Labour or the Tories had not won a nationwide vote. It showed that the old allegiances on which our politics are predicated have broken down. It also reminded us that none of the parties are national affairs any more; Labour came third in four regions, as the Tories did in six. On this result, Ukip have more claim to be a national party than them; they came in the top two in more parts of Britain than either Labour or the Tories.

Ukip won by increasing its vote share by 11 per cent. This would be a remarkable achievement in any campaign, but it is particularly striking given that the last European elections took place during the 2009 expenses scandal, the presumed zenith of anti-political feeling. That the Ukip vote is still growing at such a rate shows that public anger at the political class has not abated. Go out on the campaign trail and you hear voters complaining even more loudly than before about how no one is listening to them on immigration and a host of other issues.

On his victory lap, Farage rather cheekily thanked Nick Clegg for challenging him to two debates on Europe. These debates — and Farage’s clear victories in them — kick-started the Ukip campaign. This has added to Clegg’s woes. Liberal Democrat MPs were already worried that his defeats in these debates showed that the electorate was just not prepared to listen to anything that their leader had to say. After coming fifth in the European elections and losing all but one of their MEPs, they’re a lot more worried.

But this does not mean they want Clegg replaced as leader. The attempt to oust him garnered minimal support. Lib Dem MPs might have their doubts about Clegg’s leadership but they are far from convinced that a change would solve all problems. I’m told that the mood in the parliamentary party is one of ‘ambivalence’.

The reality is that if you are a Lib Dem MP in strong Labour territory you are going to lose your seat. It’s a hard thing for any MP to accept, but particularly hard for a Liberal Democrat. The party has always believed there was no problem that simply working harder, doing more case-work and delivering more leaflets couldn’t solve. But now that the Liberal Democrats are a party of government, this simply isn’t true any more.


The Deputy Prime Minister’s internal critics suggest that either a change of leader or pulling out of the coalition could give endangered MPs a fighting chance. But either approach could endanger the party’s MPs in Tory-leaning seats.

The past few days have shown that the only person who can remove Clegg is Clegg himself. As long as he makes it clear that he isn’t prepared to leave quietly, his party will balk at trying to forcibly remove him. Lib Dems do not have the stomach for a long and divisive struggle with no guarantee of success.

Clegg has also been lucky in his enemies. Lord Oakeshott, the Lib Dem peer and old friend of Vince Cable, has been none too subtle in his plotting. Indeed, he has been so obvious that Cable has had to publicly disown him to demonstrate his loyalty, and Oakeshott has had to resign from the party.

The Lib Dem leadership is keen to stress that it is open to suggestions about how to change its strategy. But such statements are about party management rather than anything else. The electorate will not notice the Liberal Democrats recalibrating their approach to coalition. Indeed, a large part of the party’s problem is that the voters are aware of so few of the things that it has done in government. As one senior party figure puts it, everyone knows about their U-turn on tuition fees and some people know about the income-tax threshold and that’s about it. Blocking a few more Tory measures won’t bring former supporters flocking back.

These lost Liberal Democrat voters have moved into the Labour column and are propping up Ed Miliband. Without them, these election results would have been catastrophic for the Labour leader rather than just bad. As it is, he remains within striking distance of Downing Street even after his recent setbacks. That’s why there are senior Tories who are keen for the Liberal Democrats to replace Clegg with a more left-wing leader.

Labour’s European election result was awful for an opposition party; no opposition has ever triumphed at a general election not having won the preceding European election. Labour’s failure shows that the leadership cannot simply dismiss Ukip as David Cameron’s problem. Farage’s forces are threatening to exploit the gap between Labour’s leadership and its traditional support base. In this campaign, Ukip made inroads into the Labour vote for the first time by promising to stop low-skilled EU immigration into Britain. This is a policy offer that Labour can’t match.

Farage is now convinced that his party can keep these Labour voters and pick up some more between now and the next election. Ukip’s next manifesto will therefore not be as libertarian as its previous ones.

This is one of the reasons why the Tories are less concerned at Ukip’s success than you would expect. For more than a year, Westminster has operated under the assumption that the Tory party would panic if it came third in the European elections behind Ukip. Instead, it has taken the result in its stride.

The Tories cannot, however, simply assume that a large chunk of the Ukip vote will return to them at the general election. The decline of tribal voting means that support has to be earned. Cameron will need to show that he can do something concrete to address voter concerns on immigration and Europe if he is to bring them back.

Ukip needs to win seats at Westminster if it is to establish itself as more than a party of protest. But it is a sign of its success that the next general election will be decided by how its current supporters cast their votes.

More Spectator for less. Subscribe and receive 12 issues delivered for just £12, with full web and app access. Join us now.

  • Gary Wintle

    Oakeshott (who predicted the failure of the sham Project Merlin, and has fought against corruption, not being afraid to point to it in his own party) is a principled man, unlike Clegg. Releasing poll details is well within his rights, politicians “leak” stuff all the time, why is it wrong for Oakeshott to do it, especially given he is motivated by the rather noble desire to remove a weak and useless leader?

  • Bill_der_Berg

    You can say what you like about Cleggie, his honesty is beyond question.

    I quote from an old article of his.

    “The Guardian,

    Nick Clegg

    Monday 8 December 2003 09.26 GMT

    MEPs are parliamentary giants. Don’t snigger. There are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the European parliament, but irrelevance or lack of importance, the stock accusations, are laughably wide of the mark.

    Probably half of all new legislation now enacted in the UK begins in Brussels. The European parliament has extensive powers to amend or strike down laws in almost every conceivable area of public life.”

  • Peter Stroud

    Clegg is an old school Liberal, but he and his ilk are now in a minority within the party. The majority are disaffected socialists, like Cable and Oakshott. This is why Labour hate the LibDems, even more than the Tories. There will always be infighting, even though the party is thirty years old. It was, After all, it was a marriage of convenience. The left of the party would love to ditch Clegg for a leftist: but it won’t happen, unless the leader wishes to go.

  • Laura Zamora

    !!! How Dr.Ukaka Save My Broken Heart Of Marriage Today !!!

    Glorious be unto Dr. Ukaka the great man and ever, my name is Sarah from Taxes city usa. since 1 and a half year I have witness what is called heart broken. my boyfriend that promised me marriage failed me and impregnate me and leave,he dump me,he stop calling” he stop picking my calls,and he no longer respond to me. I have be looking for solution,I fall into the hands of fake spell caster,they rough me off and took my money without help.I have cried,I have weep”and tears runs out of eyes. The silentness in my heart brought me to the deepest path of failure that I lost my job. Crying all day,because of my life was lonely. So thanks to Ukaka that came into my life and brought me the greatest joy that was lost. I saw his mail while browsing and I contact and tell him what I am passing through with no doubt because what saw about him,was enough to believe. And I was given words of solution on what to do. I can’t really help thinking about it I have tried to see what I can do, I manage to provide him some materials and he help me with the rest,after casting the spell, 12hrs later he came with rose on his hand and I was even about going out,i saw him in front of my door when he sees me he knee and said he is dying I should forgive him and accept him back he was crying,I can’t wait to let him finish I quickly crab him and kiss him, just then” he said he is restless without me, just as the prophet has said he will be. He brought out a ring and put it on my hand. Our wedding day was scheduled,1week after we got married. today makes it 2weeks and we are living happily I don’t know how to praise him enough, he has done me a thing I can never forget. And I can’t really share to myself alone, I want y’all to help me praise him because if it is wasn’t for him I already plan of committing suicide. But right now I am now so happy more than I was before. And you out there crying for help you’ve already got one,Ukaka is the man that you need in all rampart. contact his address if you need his service, freedomlovespell@hotmail.com also contact him on his web site: freedomlovespelltemple.yolasite.com

Can't find your Web ID? Click here